LipoDyne Supplement Facts

Row	Amount per serving	% Daily Value
Garcinia Cambogia Extract (fruit rind)	500 mg	†
Green Tea Extract (Camellia sinensis) (leaf)	250 mg	†
Apple Cider Vinegar Powder	150 mg	†
Caffeine Anhydrous	100 mg	†
Cayenne Pepper Extract	50 mg	†
Black Pepper Extract (BioPerine)	10 mg	†

Serving size 1 capsule. Servings per container 60. The dagger marks a row for which no Daily Value has been established, which on this panel is every row: the % Daily Value column carries a heading and no figures.

Other ingredients: vegetable cellulose (capsule), rice flour, magnesium stearate, silicon dioxide.

Everything a buyer is entitled to rely on about the contents of this capsule is in that box. The front of the bottle carries a product name, a category line and a capsule count; the panel carries the declaration.

The order of the rows is itself information. A Supplement Facts panel lists its actives by weight, heaviest first, and this one descends cleanly from 500 mg to 10 mg with no ties. That tells a reader the garcinia row is the bulk of the fill and the pepper row is a rounding detail.

There is no proprietary blend line anywhere on it. That single absence is the reason every other page on this website can be specific, and it is rarer in this category than the shelf suggests.

Every figure in the middle column is printed on the panel. The right-hand column is arithmetic anyone can repeat.

Two of those lines settle questions that come up constantly. The serving size decides that this is a one-capsule product rather than a two-capsule product dressed as one, which changes the cost per day and the caffeine total in the same stroke.

The shell decides a dietary question outright. A vegetable cellulose capsule is printed on the label rather than asserted by a badge, which is the correct order for that kind of claim.

The container line is the one to hold against the invoice. 60 servings at one a day is the arithmetic the price on the pricing page is divided by.

The % Daily Value column on this panel has a heading and no numbers. A dagger sits in every row and the footnote reads that no Daily Value has been established.

That is correct labelling rather than an omission. Daily Values exist for nutrients with a published intake reference: vitamins, minerals, protein, fibre and the rest. Botanical extracts and caffeine have no such reference, so there is no percentage to print and a responsible label prints a dagger.

It also tells a reader something about the formula. A panel where every single row carries the dagger contains no vitamin and no mineral at all, which is the shortest available proof that this is a botanical and stimulant product. Anyone who wants to check the claim made elsewhere on this site that there are no vitamins in the bottle can check it in that column without reading a word of the rows.

The dagger is reproduced on this website in place of the asterisk the bottle uses. A loose asterisk in body copy reads as a claim marker pointing at a footnote that is not there, and the symbol was changed rather than the meaning.

Beneath the actives every panel carries a second list, and its job is different. The actives list what the product is sold for. The other-ingredients list what else is in the capsule, in descending order of weight, with no amounts given.

This one reads: vegetable cellulose (capsule), rice flour, magnesium stearate, silicon dioxide. Four entries, and the convention means the shell is the heaviest of them.

No amounts appear on this list anywhere in the category, which is normal and worth knowing rather than resenting. The regulation asks for identity and order, not quantity, on the grounds that these materials are present for manufacture rather than for effect.

For a buyer the line answers three questions and no others: what the shell is made of, whether a known allergen is present, and whether anything on it conflicts with a dietary rule. On this bottle the answers are vegetable cellulose, nothing declared, and no conflict with a vegetarian diet.

The bottle artwork prints “60 Capsules” and the panel prints “Servings Per Container: 60”. The marketplace listing’s item specifics field prints “Number of Pills: 120”.

The label is the document that governs and the figure is 60. Two independent places on the packaging agree on it, the panel arithmetic depends on it, and item specifics on a marketplace listing are a seller-entered metadata field rather than part of the product.

Three other fields in the same block describe a different product entirely: “Ingredients: Multivitamin, Vitamin B12”, “Dosage: 5 mg” and “Organic”. The panel has no vitamin, no mineral, no 5 mg row and no organic certification anywhere on it. Taken together those four fields look like a template left unedited rather than a description of this bottle.

The consequence for a buyer is a price one, and it is settled on the pricing page: a bottle is 60 capsules, so the cost per capsule is $0.38 and not half that. Anyone who budgeted on the listing figure has budgeted for twice the supply.

Three things sit outside what this panel can settle, and they are collected here rather than repeated beside every row.

Extract strength. Five of the six rows are plant concentrates and none carries a standardisation percentage. The garcinia row gives a weight of extract rather than a weight of hydroxycitric acid; the green tea row gives a weight of extract rather than a weight of catechins or EGCG. The ingredients page works through what that costs a reader.

Provenance. A panel names materials, not origins. Where the garcinia was grown, who extracted it and to what specification are questions the bottle does not answer, and the “foreign and domestic ingredients” seal on the pack is a sourcing disclosure rather than an answer. The quality page reads every seal in turn.

Identity testing. A printed amount is a specification the manufacturer has committed to. It is not a laboratory result for the bottle in your hand. An assay of products in this wider category is the reason the distinction matters, and no certificate accompanies a retail bottle in this category from any seller.

None of those three is unusual and none is hidden. They are the standing limits of a supplement panel, and a reader who knows them can get a great deal out of this one.

The middle column shows the FORM a stronger label takes, using figures typical of commercial extracts. They are illustrations of what a standardisation line looks like and not statements about this product.

Five lines of extra print is the whole difference between a panel a reader can check and a panel a reader can only read. It costs nothing to add and a number of labels in this category do add it.

The reason this table is worth publishing on a website that sells the product is that the bottle is already most of the way there. A label that prints six amounts and no blend has done the hard part; the remaining gap is a specification line, and naming it is more useful to a buyer than pretending it is closed.